Talk:Right Wing Resistance

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Doug Weller in topic Websites possible rebranding

COI edit

The creator of this page states that he is Kyle Chapman, see [1]. Dougweller (talk) 13:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Websites possible rebranding edit

The new one, http://www.order-rwr.org/right-wing-resistance/, says " our website is www.rwrnz.blogspot.com" - but that seems to be a copy of a greeting email. If this new website is a new/split whatever, that might just be carelessness. But the new site also says "RWR Founded ORDER late winter 2015. The decision was made that a change of direction was needed to grow the organisation beyond its strong hold in New Zealand and beyond its street based activities." so this could be a rebranding. Doug Weller talk 10:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

There's also https://rwrsite.wordpress.com and if we believe this page[2] there's been a leadership change. But this[3] doesn't back it, and I don't see how we can use one of several websites as a source when we don't know if there is only one group with several websites, competing groups, or what. Doug Weller talk 10:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
There's definitely been a leadership change. The orginal site [4] lists the new leader as Vaughan Tocker and this seems to be confirmed by the only media coverage they've got in the last year [5]. The two new websites list Peter Kramer as the leader. All three websites are referring to the same group as the one formerly led by Kyle Chapman. The two new ones refer to an international organisation, which hasn't been confirmed by any reliable sources. I suspect that Kramer is the only member outside NZ and the Daily Record is referring to a completely different organisation. All of the RWR website are hopelessly unreliable so I wouldn't worry too much about what they say. -- haminoon (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Apologies I see now the Daily Record is referring to a related group. Although I doubt the article is very reliable - it refers to the NZ group as a cell. I'm wondering if its possible to have a reliable wiki article on a group(s) as small and inconsequential as this one. -- haminoon (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

((ec)):::And we have the Swedish IP continuing to insert 1 website. Doug Weller talk 12:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply