Talk:Right Now (Leon Jackson album)

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

UK sales figures - 03 February 2009

Although there may not be an official BPI certification for Right Now, the sales can be above 60,000 because the certificates are not automatic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Phonographic_Industry#Sales_certificates

I believe that my sources are correct and the 2008 UK sales are 122,000+, as it has been corroborated in several forums. However, I agree that they are not authoritative sources.

Considering that no link to an authoritative source has been found, the UK sales figures should be considered as unavailable.

--Notsooldafterall (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm inclined to agree; most other albums focus on chart position and certification, I'm really not sure why sales are necessary here - they're a nightmare to source, and immediately cause problems because even if we can source one country, another country gets left out. Surely chart position and certification is what most readers are interested in, anyway? I say we leave it for a few days and if no one objects we be bold and remove the sales column.

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 17:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've done it, but there's a Nimbley6 sock active right now who will almost certainly revert me. I'm not going to edit-war over it, provided Nimbley6 leaves the fact tags in. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 20:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

If worldwidealbums cannot be used as reference, and there is no official BPI gold certification, then I agree that the sales and certifications should be N/A. --Notsooldafterall (talk) 21:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, the worldwidealbums ref I tried to add "http://" to it, and hit the spam blacklist. I've removed the sales column entirely - I think there is a case for certification (most other similar articles use it) but it should be N/A until Silver etc disks are awarded. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 21:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The other page with the same information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Jackson_discography should probably be edited as well.. Anyway, there shouldn't be the same info in two different places.. --Notsooldafterall (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, totally agree. The problem is our friend Nimbley6... I'm not sure there';s much justification for the discography article at all. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 21:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's done. I have changed the table in 'Leon Jackson discography' in accordance to this discussion, and replaced the chart info that was on this page with a link to it.--Notsooldafterall (talk) 06:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Stargazing (Leon Jackson song) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Song fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG Richhoncho (talk) 08:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Redirected, as all of the referenced material is already at the target (nothing to merge). Klbrain (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Right Now (Leon Jackson album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic