Talk:Rift valley

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Gorthian in topic External links modified

Merge into Rift (geology) article? edit

no . See Talk:Rift (geology) i say no!!

I think it is a good idea and would be less confusing for students like me! : )

ya i agree but as long as long as theres a heading sayin rift valley

--• Storkian • 03:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rift systems edit

An anon has added/modified material to make this article rift system. Seems that rift system would be a viable article, but the current article should retain its focus on simple geomorphic valleys formed by rifts. The details of complex rift systems seem a bit much for this article and deserve a dedicated article focussing on the tectonic processes. Comments? Vsmith (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

And to add to the mix, we already have Rift. I agree with your suggestion. Rift should be included in a more specific article, or renamed to Rift system.
We also need consistency in citation format; as the footnote system was already in use, we should keep it, and provide page cites to sources. Kablammo (talk) 12:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
An additional article "rift system" is unnecessary. It should be part of the article on rifts. It certainly doesn't belong here. A valley is a geographic feature, a rift is a geologic/tectonic feature. A rift system is simply a plurality of related rifts. Tmangray (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I created rift system as a redirect to rift. The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 16:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Rift Valley Lakes edit

Changed intro sentence from "The largest freshwater lakes in the world are all located in rift valleys except for Lake Victoria"; the North American great lakes are not in a rift valley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:4F80:80B:39CB:D9EC:78DD:4089 (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rift valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. — Gorthian (talk) 19:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply