This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In looking over the article, trying to decide whether to review it or not, it seemed like almost all the sources were primary sources, e.g. interviews, whereas the Wikipedia:Good article criteria require that sources for anything other than information that is not controversial mys come from reliable sources. This is particularly important in the "Critical reception" section. Can you point out which ones are secondary sources? (I had trouble loading a couple of those citations in my browser.) Thanks, MathewTownsend (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
The last four citations, i.e. the citations in the Reception section, are secondary. Pancake (talk) 07:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm not going to make a checklist. I'm just going to list out the problems I see:
Intro: "While the series' first season mainly referenced horror films, "Ride Me to Hell" pays homage to 1970s cop shows, and Clark saw Grimes unleashing his memories from the 1970s as an opportunity to parody cop shows such as CHiPs and Starsky and Hutch." Reword to "While the series' first season mainly referenced horror films, "Ride Me to Hell" pays homage to 1970s cop shows. Clark used Grimes unleashing his memories from the 1970s as an opportunity to parody cop shows such as CHiPs and Starsky and Hutch."
Intro: "According to Nielsen Media Research, "Ride Me to Hell" was watched by 814,000 viewers in its original airing and dropped in total viewership from previous episodes." Reword into "According to Nielsen Media Research, "Ride Me to Hell" was watched by 814,000 viewers in its original airing, a slight drop in total viewership when compared to previous episodes."
Plot: "While trying to take down Aldermach as he became the new leader of Hell, Grimes accidentally killed a disguised Jimmy." Reword into "While trying to take down Aldermach when he became the new leader of Hell, Grimes accidentally killed a disguised Jimmy."
That's it! Fix this issues within seven days and the article passes!--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
