Talk:Ride, Red, Ride in Hi-Fi
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Red Allen-World on a String (album cover).jpg
editImage:Red Allen-World on a String (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Not the original
editThe article is about the 1991 CD re-issue on Bluebird - re-packaged, re-formated, re-constructed and re-titled to appeal to the 1990s market - and not the original classic 1957 vinyl record on RCA Victor. Surely the original record "Ride, Red, Ride in Hi Fi" has the greater merit? I'd suggest replacing this article with one about the original. But it might be easier just to create another one and have both? Not sure what the policy is on this sort of thing. But I'd be very surprised if the original hasn't sold many more copies and isn't far more widely known. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)