Talk:Richmond Football Club

"Richmond Cricketers" football team is a modern invention

The name Richmond Cricketers is a name made up during recent years, possibly by Graeme Atkinson for his book "Everything You Wanted To Know About Australian Rules", published in 1982. If you read the early history of the game you will see that there was no champion team in 1858, and in the following few years there was no ladder, no trophy, no league or organisation, just a number of groups of men playing against each other, the most important of which was Melbourne FC, which framed the original rules in 1859. One of these groups went under the name "Richmond" and in the 1920s, HCA Harrison claimed to have captained them in the early days. Sometime in the early 1860s, Richmond disappears from newspaper reports as a senior team and it wasn't until the present club was founded in 1885 that Richmond FC's history commences. I believe that during recent times, someone has labelled the original group "Richmond Cricketers" to distinguish them from the current club. Respected football historians such as Blainey, Mancini, Hibbins, Hess, Stewart, Turner and Sandercock etc. do not mention a Richmond Cricketers team. This section should have been left as originally written. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.101.141.161 (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Richmond80s.png

Image:Richmond80s.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Richmond 2007-Clash.gif

Image:Richmond 2007-Clash.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Richmond-2007.gif

Image:Richmond-2007.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Richmond80s.png

Image:Richmond80s.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:2006 AFL Richmond.jpg

Image:2006 AFL Richmond.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

"Big Four"

Use of the term "Big Four" is highly controversial and should be revised. It lacks neutrality. It could be argued with equal lack of neutrality that the "Big Four" is really the "Big Three" and Richmond. Given Richmond have been arguably the least successful side in the competition since 1982, this is highly controversial —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.32.144 (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Under 19's premiership list

Richmond won the under 19's premiership in 1942.--Serioustabs (talk) 02:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Richmond Football Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070317035606/http://www.richmondfc.com.au:80/TheClub/History/HallofFame/tabid/7638/Default.aspx to http://www.richmondfc.com.au/TheClub/History/HallofFame/tabid/7638/Default.aspx
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070317035606/http://www.richmondfc.com.au:80/TheClub/History/HallofFame/tabid/7638/Default.aspx to http://www.richmondfc.com.au/TheClub/History/HallofFame/tabid/7638/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed Mick Malthouse picture

I'm bringing this here because it's one of the clubs Mick has been associated with. I'm just seeking a few more views on a discussion underway about an image an editor has proposed for the article. See the article history and the Tak page. HiLo48 (talk) 03:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Nickname

Is it worth having a separate chapter on the main Richmond Football Club page titled Nickname (or something to that effect). Atm, the information pertaining to club's monikers over the century - Richmondite, Wasps, Tigers, is up in the VFA section of the article, and I think it would be better if it was branched out into its own heading (and hence part of the content, much like the 'Song' chapter), as there's quite a bit of information and citation I would like to post without expanding the existing 1800s section. Thank you. Rhett Rhett Bartlett (Rhettrospective) (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)