Talk:Richard of Wallingford

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Astrology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A bit off topic, but I found this article because someone's selling a book by Richard of Wallingford for $2,100 on amazon. Do people spend that much on rare books over amazon? Well, I tagged this article for cleanup and will try to fix it up to my satisfaction. Corrigann 16:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

sounds cheap if it's by him. Well, I don't know how much 700-year-old 'books' cost - I know they're priceless, but I don't know how priceless. A book about him, on the other hand - sounds a bit expensive, unless it's by his friend the Abbot... Cormullion 17:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Clarification needed for "position" edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

What "position" is referred to in the following paragraph from the article?

"Richard suffered from what was then thought to be leprosy (although it might have been syphilis, scrofula or tuberculosis) which he apparently contracted when he went to have his position confirmed by the Pope at Avignon. He died at St Albans."

If, as I'm assuming (I know nothing about the subject), it's his ecclessiastical position then it needs to say so. I suggest: "...when he went to have his position as abbot confirmed by the Pope...." Random Passer-by 02:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Answered my own question.Random Passer-by 02:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic