This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's not entirely clear that the "McLibel 2" case was "successful", even from a purely technical legal perspective. Although McDonalds won on several points, they also lost on several points. The case was also "successfully" referred to the European Courts by the McLibel 2 (although due to the nature of such, it was against the UK rather than McDonalds). In wider terms (PR etc) it was certainly far from successful! --Salvadors 07:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
