Talk:Richard Field (theologian)

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Anglicanism Mid‑importance

	Richard Field (theologian) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hertfordshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

WikiProject class rating

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gough

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think that may be Richard Gough (antiquarian), but can't be sure. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think it is he, too, as there is no other Gough who would seem to fit Richard Hooper's reference to Gough, expecting the reader as he did to know exactly whom he meant by just 'Gough'. The dates fit. Gough's article on Richard Field was published in the now non-existent(?) Volume VI of the edition of Biographia Britannica edited by Andrew Kippis and published (if it ever was published) sometime in or after 1793 (Gough died aged 73 in 1809). Chalmers' transcription of Gough's article, published in his Biographical Dictionary deos survive. Verntheurn (talk) 11:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic