| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
The section entitled 'The Australia Institute' reads as propaganda and should be removed. In the absence of a contest on this matter I am proposing to remove it altogether and if any part is to be retained incorporate it in another section. Gumsaint (talk) 01:41, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
The content in the section entitled 'The Australia Institute' belongs on a page about the institute and here appears to be an assertion of a favourable POV without a clear justification of its purpose. Gumsaint (talk) 03:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
As stated above I am proposing to remove the section and looking for some arguments why it should stay and some precedents for such an inclusion in a page about a notable person. Gumsaint (talk) 03:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- I don't object to removing the second two paragraphs in that section from this page (although the first is necessary context here) - because you are correct, they belong on a page about the institute - but the claims of POV are nonsense. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
As he claims to be an economist, it would be useful to add his academic credentials (e.g. degrees). This would seem to be pretty basic information for a page like this. Derek Pyne2 (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- There's no Wikipedia convention that such an addition is necessary and in fact it would be absurdly fraught - how could you authenticate the details. Gumsaint (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- I just checked about five entries for economists (some famous and a couple not so famous). They all have something about education mentioned. The information is usually publicly available from either biographies or public profiles (although the Wikipedia entries I checked don't always cite a source). Nothing comes up in my searches but I would think that someone writing in this entry might have that much information about him. Derek Pyne2 (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)