Talk:Ricardian (Richard III)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Serial Number 54129 in topic Removed section

Comment

edit

I wonder if this article and Richard III Society should be merged? Avalon 04:31, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

COI concerns

edit

This month's edits by user:Solatstone appear to be written by a member of a mentioned organisation ("we"), and I think that might be inappropriate for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.67.195 (talk) 11:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've edited the relevant section so it hopefully now has a more neutral point of view and reads less like an advert for the organisation. RoryKat (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Categories

edit

Should this article really be in the "English historians" category? "Ricardians" could be a category for historians - "Ricardian" is not a historian. This seems so clear that I wonder if I have missed something obvious, hence this note without an edit (as yet - nb. that I have made unrelated changes in the first paragraph. "unsigned preceding comment" written by self in error). —Preceding unsigned comment added by RJ Gordon (talkcontribs) 23:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Entry changed on the Society's request (I am developing the Richard III wiki). Jackiespeel (talk) 21:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Richard III Society should have their own article

edit

The Richard III Society should have their own article given that they found the body of Richard III, a significant historical contribution, comparable to Howard Carter finding the tomb of Tutankhamun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.171.40.25 (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Go on then! WP:BEBOLD. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 09:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removed section

edit

I have removed the section on the Ricardian Friends oraganisation, as absolutely no sources reliable or otherwise mention them at all. A non-entity of a group indulging in a touch of self-aggrandisment I suspect. >SerialNumber54129...speculates 21:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply