Talk:Ribnitz-Damgarten

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeRibnitz-Damgarten was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Sources edit

The standard works on this topic are

Kühl, P. : Geschichte der Stadt und des Klosters Ribnitz in Einzeldarstellungen. Studien z. Landschaftskde., Kolonisation, Kultur- u. Wirtschaftsgesch. d. äußersten Nordostecke Mecklenburgs. -- Ribnitz, Kogge, 1933. 753 S.

and

Erichson, H.: Zur Geschichte der Städte Ribnitz und Damgarten von der Gründung im 13. Jahrhundert bis zum Zusammenschluß im Jahre 1950. Ribnitz-Damgarten 1997. 297 S.

I have access to the second one and will add references when I have the time. The first one is certainly preferrable as a source.

Failed "good article" nomination edit

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of March 18, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Much of the article appears to be well-written, but single sentences should not stand alone. Either incorporate them into another paragraph or expand upon them.
2. Factually accurate?: Only one source is used in this article. Add more sources (don't be afraid to use online sources), and by doing so, you can help to expand the article of more information.
3. Broad in coverage?: The main reason that I am failing this article is because the article is not broad enough. Look to other GA/FAs of cities for examples of other sections of information you can to the article to expand it. Again, by adding more sources, you can find new information to add to the article as well as expanding the current small paragraphs.
4. Neutral point of view?: I don't see any problems here, make sure it stays that way.
5. Article stability? Looks good.
6. Images?: Good job getting all of the free images

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. Altogether, the article mainly just needs to be expanded and more sources added. At this point I am failing the article and once the above suggestions are fixed (maybe consider getting a peer review as well) you can renominate for GAC. Good job so far, but keep improving! --Nehrams2020 19:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ribnitz-Damgarten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply