This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have reworked this article because a) Rhôs is more than just a kingdom. It was a later cantref too. b) The King Cynlas and archaeology details appear to have been taken directly from John Northall's article on Castle of Wales. I have removed the kinglist because it was incomplete, the dates were pure supposition and Cynlas & Owain are now both mentioned in the text (with appropriate links). Walgamanus 15:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Rhos, as a word and a proper noun, does not have a circumflex in modern Welsh. (A single vowel before 's' is long by default.) Recommend renaming article to 'Rhos' with appropriate edits. Siswrn 20:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Siswrn is absolutely correct. 'Rhôs' is just ridiculous. This article should be renamed. Enaidmawr 00:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Just checked and there's a disambiguation page 'Rhos'. That complicates things slightly but this article should still definitely be renamed. Any suggestions? Enaidmawr 00:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
