Talk:Rhizodermis
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
2007-10-1 Automated pywikipediabot message edit
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://s10.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/e05/05b.htm https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC152204/ https://books.google.ca/books?id=6W3sCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA57&lpg=PA57&dq=%22Structural+differences+between+these+cells+appear%22&source=bl&ots=49YonLK3Lc&sig=sfsmyUHT-zOivN50XtrI4qLbKuM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZooGQsqbTAhUQ0IMKHYMPDPoQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=%22Structural%20differences%20between%20these%20cells%20appear%22&f=false https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9501025 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/51298740_fig1_FIG-1-Longitudinal-structure-of-the-epidermis-of-the-root-tip-in-wild-type-and-mutants http://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/tlw3/virtual_labs/lab10/labs/lab10/resources/original.pdf https://eurekamag.com/research/000/810/000810800.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 11:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
The information given is too short edit
In the given Wikipedia , the reference given is too short . However , when you look through the Google and AI like ChatGpt and Bard it will give a well define reaserch and answer . It is probably someone who edited all the important data . Steven Willers (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)