Talk:Rhinocarcinosoma

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Ichthyovenator in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rhinocarcinosoma/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • "portrusion" – typo?
Yeah, fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "and a slightly different" – is the "a" necessary?
Not really, removed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Viatnamese" – typo
Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Reconsturction" – typo
Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "in turn".
Not sure that's correct, rephrased instead. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

edit
  1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
  2.   Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable.   Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style.   Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4.   Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body.   Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used are reliable.   Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found.   Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No flagrant copyright issues found.   Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
  6.   Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article broadly covers all major aspects.   Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without unnecessary deviations.   Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8.   Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.   Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10.   Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present.   Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12.   Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged.   Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and caption are good.   Pass