Talk:Revolt of the Three Feudatories

A new start

I'm going to wipe out all the unreferenced parts in this article completely and do a clean start. It's poorly written and a lot of inaccurate information have been added in by some irresponsible editors. I'm going to write a new version based on translated information from Chinese Wikipedia. Of course, the referenced info can stay. Anyone opposes this idea? _LDS (talk) 05:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I've done it. The editors can now add back some of the removed information, provided that it is factually accurate and supported by reliable sources. _LDS (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Sources

Fan Chengmo and other Han Bannermen refused to join the revolt and this played a critical role in the Qing victory.

http://books.google.com/books?id=8nXLwSG2O8AC&pg=PA1116&dq=man+han+yijia&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LnEwVIKKL7CZsQSHiYKQBg&ved=0CDwQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=man%20han%20yijia&f=false

Borni's Chahar Mongol revolt against the Qing

http://books.google.com/books?id=8piRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA15#v=onepage&q&f=false

The Qing used mainly Han Chinese troops to fight the Han Chinese rebels.

http://books.google.com/books?id=8piRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA15#v=onepage&q=fight%20other&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=zviQAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT1&dq=Diary+soldier+china&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nXEwVI2WKKbhsASf_IJ4&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Fight%20other&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=8piRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA15#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=8piRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=8piRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA25#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=Nn_61ts-hQwC&pg=PA32#v=onepage&q&f=false

Mongol revolt against Qing (primary source)

http://books.google.com/books?id=k2gq4FQON2gC&pg=PA29&dq=There+was,+moreover,+a+strong+disposition+on+the+part+of+the+Mongols+of+Tartary,+under+a+leader+who+was+reputed+to+be+descended+from+Jenghiz+Khan,+to+make+common+cause+with+the+Chinese.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WkM5VIL3Cc3bsASVq4LYDQ&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=There%20was%2C%20moreover%2C%20a%20strong%20disposition%20on%20the%20part%20of%20the%20Mongols%20of%20Tartary%2C%20under%20a%20leader%20who%20was%20reputed%20to%20be%20descended%20from%20Jenghiz%20Khan%2C%20to%20make%20common%20cause%20with%20the%20Chinese.&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=XEBBAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA29&dq=There+was,+moreover,+a+strong+disposition+on+the+part+of+the+Mongols+of+Tartary,+under+a+leader+who+was+reputed+to+be+descended+from+Jenghiz+Khan,+to+make+common+cause+with+the+Chinese.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WkM5VIL3Cc3bsASVq4LYDQ&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=There%20was%2C%20moreover%2C%20a%20strong%20disposition%20on%20the%20part%20of%20the%20Mongols%20of%20Tartary%2C%20under%20a%20leader%20who%20was%20reputed%20to%20be%20descended%20from%20Jenghiz%20Khan%2C%20to%20make%20common%20cause%20with%20the%20Chinese.&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=uVpGAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA200&dq=of+the+Mongols+of+Tatary,+under+a+leader+who+was+reputed+to+be+descended+from+Jenghiz+Khan,+to+make+common+cause+with+the&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nkM5VNHjLKvksATGyIGwBA&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=of%20the%20Mongols%20of%20Tatary%2C%20under%20a%20leader%20who%20was%20reputed%20to%20be%20descended%20from%20Jenghiz%20Khan%2C%20to%20make%20common%20cause%20with%20the&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Coherence

This article is difficult to understand because the information is not presented coherently. In some places it is presented out of order, in others it is repeated. There is a section called 'Causes' that does not discuss any causes. I'm going to reorganise the material, removing the repetitions, and presenting it as clearly as possible in coherent order.Mccapra (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)