Talk:Revlon
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Animal Testing edit
Maybe this article should mention how Revlon tests their products on animals. See PETA's shopping guide for caring consumers...
http://www.caringconsumer.com/resources_companies.asp
(Revlon is on the "Companies That Do Test On Animals" list.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.186.120 (talk) 02:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Animal Testing Response to 72.160.186.120, above edit
Revlon does NOT appear on your link, above. In fact, that very site claims Revlon stopped animal testing in 1990.
http://www.caringconsumer.com/company_revlon.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.196.195 (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Acquisition of Armour Pharmaceutical edit
My dad had worked for Armour since the late '40s and was one of several employees who ended up at U.S. Vitamin after Revlon purchased Armour's pharmaceutical division from Greyhound. He was also one of the first let go when Revlon's cosmetic divisions started losing money in the early '80s. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Helpful IP user edit
A helpful IP user just did some nice fixing up, slimming the article down significantly - although, I suspect they were a Revlon employee. As an example of a good change, I really don't think a complete list of their spokes models is appropriate for the core Revlon article. Maybe spin it off into a list? It still desperately needs someone to go through and fix the very...marketing inspired language, so I'm leaving the tag in place for now. Chris Croy (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Philanthropy/charity work section? edit
Maybe a section should be added that discusses Revlon's charities...the Revlon/UCLA cancer program, the Run/Walk for Women, the various products sold for charity, the Fire and Ice Balls and such. 12Name12 (talk) 13:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Bankruptcy protection edit
Current text has "This comes after avoid bankruptcy in 2020." Apart from the phrasing, this is uninformative and I have no idea what it refers to. It appears to allude to information that would be relevant.Gregory Cherlin (talk) 05:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)