Talk:Review of International Organizations

Untitled

Dear Wikipedia-Community, I have added a "references that appears in reliable third-party publications", more specifically, the Social Sciences Citation Index, which is probably the number one reliable third-party reference existing for academic journals. It would be amazing if you could review this article again and remove the two warning boxes on the top? :-) Thank you so much and have a wonderful weekend everyone! --DeGiAlive (talk) 10:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

"Scientific Spam"

It is good that we have this article. It does not seem good to me how it came into existence. It was created by a new account that contributed nothing else but a speedily deleted German (sic!) article about a firm from the city where the editor of this journal resides. What is relevant for an encyclopedia should be decided by neutral parties from the community, not the surrounding of people who try to (ab)use it for self-marketing. Similar issues occured in various other articles, e.g., Globalization Index or Human trafficking, cf. Special:Contributions/134.155.250.225, User_talk:129.132.65.139, User_talk:134.76.2.80, User_talk:134.76.2.75, User talk:134.76.172.114, User_talk:SDC#Please_do_not_spam, User talk:Charmandander, User talk:Savelloc. I don't think this helps accuracy or neutrality. It should not be scientists themselves who decide which information about what they do is relevant here. Knopffabrik (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)