Correct to redirect the Business term Resourcing to Resource_(disambiguation) ? edit

I consider wrong to redirect the Business term Resourcing to page Resource_(disambiguation).

Page Resourcing has proven to have several visits pr day since it was created (see http://stats.grok.se/en/201001/resourcing).

The term Resourcing is used on 161 pages in Wikipedia (see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22resourcing%22+site%3Aen.wikipedia.org), where in some cases in linked form like on page Management in line nr 2, explaining the essence of Management as "Resourcing encompasses the deployment and manipulation of..." ...resources.

Redirecting the Business term Resourcing to Resource_(disambiguation) leaves the term Resourcing unexplained on Wikipedia.

As a termporary resolve, i have here added information, all with internal links, about what Resourcing is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GardmanVS (talkcontribs) 17:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


Should here be something about 'resource' in a ecological sense ? I mean how biologists use 'resource' in a foraging context ?

A resource in a foraging context is a direct subset of natural resources, so I'm going to remove the expansion notice MadCow257 23:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

and then u should eat pie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.185.0.213 (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply