Talk:Resolute Forest Products/Archives/2017
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 86.156.56.188 in topic Article does not represent a neutral point of view
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Article does not represent a neutral point of view
This article is currently unbalanced and does not represent the subject from a neutral point of view. The article devotes two thirds of its total text to the "Controversy" section. In this section, the text presents essentially a single point of view, that of the environmentalists' point of view, with little or nothing about the company's point of view or response to accusations. Peacock (talk) 17:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Removed. It's an WP:IDL tag. It's you who has a POV issue if you think cutting down huge swathes of ancient forest is something to dismiss lightly? BTW thanks for proving the theory of nominative determinism, love the name: p-COCK.86.156.56.188 (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)