Talk:Republic (United Kingdom)

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Dogru144 in topic Farcical, oxymoronic title

Non-notable. What does this society do? Does it have events, members? What is it?--Couter-revolutionary 22:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

How childish of youRepublicUK 20:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's not being childish. I am wondering if it does anything? Does it? You ought know...--Couter-revolutionary 20:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is a campaign for an elected head of state.RepublicUK 20:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes and I'm head of the "Campaign to Make Counter-Revolutionary Wikipedia Head of State", is my organisation notable. Clearly not. What makes this one notable. --Couter-revolutionary 20:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

It has been mentioned in the media several times, It has been mentioned in the British parliament several times and has many notable supporters.RepublicUK 20:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

At the end of the day it is, of course, up to the given Admin. to take the decision, I have, however, seen articles fulfill those requirements be deleted.--Couter-revolutionary 20:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Serious article edit

This is a topic of very significant consequence. People are advocating the replacement of the British monarchy with a republic, talk that would have gotten them spedily into prison in the nineteenth century and much of the twentieth century. The issue of republic versus monarchy is one that stocked the conservative ancien regime reaction against liberalism in Britain and on the European continent throughout the nineteenth century. It is rather remarkable that editors are hurling charges such as sock puppet. This organization is a bona fide organization with dozens of supporters among political and cultural figures in British society. The BBC had given reference to it in a series of articles in 2003. Dogru144 17:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Farcical, oxymoronic title edit

This makes no sense: a republic that is linked with the United Kingdom. Dogru144 00:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply