Talk:Replanting Family Tree/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

This is the oldest albums GAN unreviewed, so I will take it on; aiming to have as many GANs as possible from the previous month or older wiped out! --K. Peake 08:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Change type to EP / Remix album in the infobox; see 4: The Remix as a guideline
  • "on 18 September 2019 through" → "on 18 September 2019, through"
  • "It is the companion EP to" → "The EP is the companion release to"
  • Note the release year of the album either in brackets or using wording relevant to the previous sentence's mention of 2019
  • "The EP contains four remixes" → "The former contains four remixes"
  • "as a bonus track, co-written by the EP's sole producer," → "as a bonus track on it, co-written by the sole producer," with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT and you need to mention this in the body because the iTunes sources back it up
  • "it was distributed" → "the remix was distributed"
  • "were described as electropop tracks and are complete reworks of their" → "are electropop tracks and completely rework their"
  • Remove the generally favourable part because only two reviews of the EP are included; change to mentioning it being included on Winkel's list

Background and release

edit
  • I have no issues with Oh Land being wikilinked here because she is one of two artists who collaborated on this album
  • The name of Oh Land's husband is not mentioned by either of the sources
  • "and a shift in sound for" → "and a shift in sound and tempo for" since the source offers a mention of this
  • "The album was officially announced" → "It was officially announced" because the preceding sentence ends with the album and the succeeding one starts with those words
  • "singles, and Oh Land embarked on a" → "singles as well as Oh Land embarking on a supporting" with the target
  • The tour is not sourced so try to back it up and remove "in support of Family Tree" once the above wording has been implemented to avoid repetition
  • "and created by" → "which was created by"
  • "Ultimately, The EP was" → "Ultimately, it was"
  • "on 18 September 2019 through" → "on 18 September 2019, through"
  • "to digital retailers." → "to digital retailers in various countries."
  • "of the E{," → "of the EP,"
  • "Replanting Family Tree, and" → "Replanting Family Tree and"
  • "In the US, the remix" → "In the United States, the remix"
  • "created by American musician Arthur Moon," → "created by Moon," because you have already mentioned his full name and he was introduced in the lead
  • It is not backed up by any of the iTunes sources that the song was originally intended for the album and you should mention that it is a bonus track at this point

Music and songs

edit
  • Img looks good!
  • Remove target on remix
  • River Beats's → River Beats', as this is how apostrophes work when words end in s
  • The "electronic-heavy production" part is not sourced; only "Salt" is mentioned as electro
  • "explained the project's concept:" → "explained the concept:" to avoid useless repetition
  • "contains with four remixes of" → "contains four remixes of"
  • ""Human Error", and" → ""Human Error" and"
  • Target synth to Synthesizer
  • "The EP proceeds with" → "Replanting Family Tree proceeds with"
  • "just over 2 minutes" → "just over two minutes" per MOS:NUM
  • "On the parent album, Bartlett" → "On Family Tree, Bartlett"
  • Keep the part about the remix being stripped down but move the premiere info to background and release for focus
  • "as an ambient pop song" → "as an ambient pop remix" because it is talking about that version, not the original

Critical reception

edit
  • Remove the opening sentence since there are not enough reviews to back that info up
  • "Keith awarded the EP a perfect 5 star rating, calling it a" → "Keith called the EP a" because the rating is in the box and you can add more of this review from the last para of the source

Track listing

edit
  • You should use a different ref for the track listing to start with, then list "When a Hawk Comes By" as a bonus track using the Spotify ref
Would my addition of "Bonus Track" to the note parameter suffice? See [1]. Carbrera (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC).Reply
Carbrera You should list it as a Spotify bonus track and add that ref in the sub-heading; see Graduation for example (apart from the lack of a ref) and use the other ref at the top of the standard track listing. --K. Peake 15:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
I don't think I understand why this is necessary, as while "When a Hawk Comes By" is referred to as a bonus track, it appears on all editions of the album, and not just Spotify. Carbrera (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC).Reply

Credits and personnel

edit
  • Good

Release history

edit
  • Good

Notes

edit
  • Good

References

edit
  • Copyvio score looks decent at 35.9%
  • Once again, you are on top with the archiving and there are no issues with the layout either this time!

Final comments and verdict

edit
Kyle Peake – thank you very much for another GA review. I believe I have addressed all of your comments within my edits. I would like to apologize for the some of the lazy edits I made that you had to point out. I need to be more careful. Thanks again, Carbrera (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC).Reply
Carbrera Good that you can learn from your mistakes as well as recognize them vocally, but you are correct about the track listing; I just did not know it was listed that way initially.  Pass now, did some slight copy editing to improve the lead prose though! --K. Peake 07:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply