A lot of the sources are incomplete (i.e. lack publisher, date of publication, access date, author/writer, pages, language template, etc.). Please see references 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19. There's also not a clear distinction between the "Sources" section and the "Bibliography" section. What is the difference? MX (✉ • ✎) 20:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- The article was first translated from French, with their style. Bibliography has books about the person, sources are other sources. I'm on vacation, have time only for urgent things. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- I made extra refs for the pieces that can be found in Authority control. Do we really need that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- @Gerda Arendt: Got it, thanks for clarifying that this was a translation from French Wikipedia. I had no idea.
- I think the biggest problem is probably the format of the sources that are already cited (i.e. they are not full references). I'll try to take care of some of them if I can work through the French. Thanks again and I hope you're having a great time on vacation. I need one too! MX (✉ • ✎) 11:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Hi, so I cleaned up a lot of the sources and fixed the Bibliography section (now Further reading). I'm still unsure what to do with the Sources section, since I tried looking for the stuff online and couldn't find anything. I removed the tag in the header because the article only needs attention in one section. MX (✉ • ✎) 14:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you, and LouisAlain! I had no connection yesterday evening, so couldn't help, or even thank. - I confess that I dislike article tags ;) - I always accept foreign language sources, AGF. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
