Talk:Rellich–Kondrachov theorem

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 160.45.109.44 in topic References

[Untitled] edit

In the book of Evans the theorem is only proofed for -domains. Could somebody give a reference, where the theorem is proved in this general setting? However the book of Evans and Gariepy on Meassure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions shows how similar estimates can be treated for Lipschitz domains. --78.55.145.142 (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I just found [[1]], which is also a generalization of a statement in Wells' "Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds". --Konrad (talk) 09:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

An overview edit

One way to prove the Rellich-Kondrachov theorem is the following: One establishes that the embedding into   is compact and the embedding into   is (well-defined and) continuous. Then, as a consequence (shown e.g. in [1] of Hölder's inequality, the embedding into   is compact for any   with  . Since the following works proceed in this manner, each contains two proofs: One of continuity and one of compactness. I only cite the latter for brevity.

There are three types of theorems that fall into this category:

  1. Embeddings of   (or more generally  ) into   with arbitrary boundary
  2. Embeddings of   (or more generally  ) into   with a nice boundary
  3. Embeddings of   (or more generally  ) into   with a nice boundary

Here are some sources:

  1. The spaces   are compactly imbedded in the spaces   for any  , if   [...] [2]
    • Assume   is a bounded open subset of   and   is  . Suppose  . Then   for each   [3] [here,   is the Sobolev conjugate of  ]
    • Let   be a bounded Lipschitz open subset of  , where  . If  , then the embedding   is compact for  . [4]
      • Let   be a bounded Lipschitz open set. We then have: If  , then the embedding   is compact for all exponents   satisfying  . [..] [5]
    • Let  ,  ,  . The identity mapping   is compact. [6]
    • Let   be an open bounded subset of   which has a   boundary  . Then, we have the following compact injections: If  ,   for any  , with  . [..] [7]
    • Let  ,  ,  . The mapping  , which defines the traces, is compact. [8]
    • Let   and let   be the dimension of  . We suppose that  . The injection of   into   is then compact for all  . [9]

Some remarks are in order:

  • Necas' book is the only source I know for a results of type (3) with a Lipschitz boundary (denoted by  , see [10].)
  • The Demengels' results fall into category (3) since   is the trace space of  .
  • The Demengels have the only result for fractional Sobolev spaces that I'm aware of.

Question: While Necas' results are very general, they are not as accessible as others. Are results of type (3) with a Lipschitz boundary presented anywhere else?

Answer: This was answered here: http://math.stackexchange.com/a/261788/10311

Notes edit

  1. ^ Demengel/Demengel, Lemma 2.82, p97
  2. ^ Gilbarg/Trudinger, p167
  3. ^ Evans, p286
  4. ^ Demengel/Demengel, p96
  5. ^ Demengel/Demengel, p220
  6. ^ Necas, p102
  7. ^ Attouch; Buttazzo; Michaille
  8. ^ Necas, p103
  9. ^ Demengel/Demengel, p167
  10. ^ Necas, p49

References edit

160.45.109.44 (talk) 12:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply