Talk:Religious tolerance

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2A00:A041:2CA0:7200:B5E4:7557:47E9:8511 in topic The text is somehow wrong!

Social studies edit

Example of religious tolerance 27.34.57.37 (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Social edit

Class 6 27.34.57.37 (talk) 12:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Religious tolerance edit

Talk 2400:1A00:B030:F31:F4E1:D189:A6CA:8540 (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The text is somehow wrong! edit

Wow, I stumbled upon this article and was really surprised: What a strange definition of a term! 'Religious toleration may signify "no more than forbearance..."'. I thought wikipedia articles should start with a proper neutral point of view definition. The very first line of the article is more like criticism and the use of words 'may signify' expresses uncertainity and "consequences" while there should be at least one sentence about the term as such. The first lines of the article should go (maybe) somewhere in the middle under 'criticism' or something like that. I'm not an experienced wikipedian, but I seriously think there is something very wrong with this article. Can some more experienced user take a look at it, please? 2A00:1028:96D5:9536:8941:7BF0:474C:A490 (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Is Wikipedia allowing propaganda and lying? Unbelievably wrongful article. This is absurdity.
This article Should NOT be up here without continuous reviews and adaquate professional reviewers. 2A00:A041:2CA0:7200:B5E4:7557:47E9:8511 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply