Talk:Religious skepticism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Edits edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I didn't make any edits but wanted to pose the question, how would you be a skeptical and not be an atheist? It seems like skepticism's consequence is necessarily atheism, and, were I to draw a ven diagram, skeptics would have a circle entirely encompassed by the circle that atheists get.

There is the option of being an agnostic. (And there is a difference.) Waluigi Freak 99 00:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Skepticism is subjective. For example I'm skeptical about some things but I'm not an atheist.

Sioraf (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite research in progress edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The heading speaks for itself. I'd love help, suggestions, etc... please direct them here or my talk page Rap Chart Mike (talk) 18:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Taking the rewrite live, I hope it's considered an improvement and Im sure someone will let me know if there are any concerns about my work. Rap Chart Mike (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic