Talk:Religious responses to the problem of evil
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Not0nshoree in topic Empty section, please expand
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Religious responses to the problem of evil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Problem of evil was copied or moved into Religious responses to the problem of evil with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Content copied edit
Content here is copied from Problem of evil which is being split because of length Jenhawk777 (talk) 00:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Red links edit
2600:1012:b011:d0ca:41f9:ddd2:e205:6de (talk · contribs) You didn't eliminate dead links you eliminated red links which are articles that have not yet been written. Putting them in articles signals to other editors that these need writing. [[1]] Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished.
They should be restored accordingly. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Empty section, please expand
edit
The Individual opinions subsection under the Christianity section is empty. I did not delete the section altogether as I feel if expanded, could benefit the article. Not0nshoree (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Nvm I may be stupid