Talk:Relatively Speaking (game show)

This page has been recently proposed for deletion (7 November 2024) by Donaldd23 (talk · contribs).

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 08:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Relatively Speaking → Relatively Speaking (game show) – Far from clear that this rather obscure game show is the primary meaning compared to the play by Alan Ayckbourn, which is currently undergoing a high-profile revival. PatGallacher (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Support a disambiguation page should be created at this title -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Support nowhere near WP:PT compared to Relatively Speaking (1967 play) or even Relatively Speaking (2011 play) In ictu oculi (talk) 23:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Comment On reflection I might even regard Ayckbourn's play as the primary meaning, but I will deal with that later. PatGallacher (talk) 12:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic