Talk:Relative dating/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archaeology

As written, the article focuses on relative dating in deep time - for geology and paleontology. There are somewhat different concerns for relative dating in recent time. Archaeologists don't need to worry about folding rock formations, but can't assume, for example, lateral continuity of structures or anthroseds. Other relative dating techniques may include seriation and may not include biostratigraphy. Jacob Haller 04:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Relative dating is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.137.196 (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Use of relative age dating in determining the age of sedimentary rocks

In the paragraph in the introduction that discusses relative versus radiometric age dating, a few lines could be added to show how relative age dating techniques when mixed with radiometric age dating techniques can be used to determine the approximate age of sedimentary rocks (which can not be directly dated using radiometric dating since the age attained is of the original grains formation as either igneous or metamorphic material.) Zappa2496 (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.92.102 (talk) 12:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

GARBLED

This sentence at the beginning of the article has got garbled somehow. Could anyone who knows what it should mean please restore or rewrite it to make sense:

The Law of Superposition was the summary outcome of 'relative dating' as observed in geology from the The regular order of fossils in rock layers had been observyears after his discovery, he published a geological map of England showing the rocks of different geologic time eras. In 1831, Smith received recognition for his work in the form of the Wollaston Medal, the highest honor of the Geological Society of London. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.36.221.105 (talk) 10:04, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Relative dating. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514145516/http://www.wesleyan.edu/ctgeology/LISproject/Relative%20ages.htm to http://www.wesleyan.edu/ctgeology/LISproject/Relative%20ages.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)