Talk:Regulations protecting consumers from microtransactions

Proposed merge of Loot box into Regulations protecting consumers from microtransactions edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Consensus is opposed to a merger. Not merged. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

It looks like the article Loot box has a very large section on regulations, with overlaps of the purpose of Regulations protecting consumers from microtransactions, so maybe some of the content from the regulations section in Loot box should be merged over into the Regulations protecting consumers from microtransactions main page article. Raladic (talk) 04:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oppose The regulations specific to loot boxes need to be covered on that page, even if some parts overlap here, as to keep the loot box page comprehensive. Masem (t) 04:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I'm not saying that everything needs to move here, but a lot of the protection laws created are really about microtransactions and not just exclusively to loot boxes (though that has often times been the impetus for creating them).
So I'm merely suggesting that those regulations that are about microtransactions be moved over here, which can also help lighten the scope of the Loot box article, which should really be about what a Loot box is, but right now it appears to have an outsizedly large amount on regulation (which could be its own article with a high level overview left behind at Loot box that talks about the fact that countries have started passing regulations to control them. Raladic (talk) 04:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Loot box is very relevant to these regulations, but they are notable on their own. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.