Talk:Regina Nuzzo

1.First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? You did a fantastic job with your article, I enjoyed reading every part of it. It is clear to understand even for people who speak English as a second language as no complex words are used and the sentences are precise. I especially liked when you subtly implied that Regina Nuzzo was the first ever person to be appointed as Senior Advisor for Statistics Communication and Media Innovation for American Statistical Association (ASA).

2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? Your article was concise and clear. However, there was one spot that confused me, it was at the ending of career section when you talk about why Nuzzo was appointed as the senior advisor for ASA. In the next line, you start talking about AMA (which I am assuming to be American Mathematical Association), but I am not sure about the link between ASA and AMA. So, giving some background knowledge about the link about the associations would be helpful. Also, I think that AMA might be a typo for ASA short form of American Statistical Association. Maybe, specifying that when you first introduce ASA would be helpful. Another thing I would consider changing would be using pronouns instead of using the name multiple times in one paragraph. I assume that making these changes would help in smoothening the flow and improves your already excellent article.

3. What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Overall, it was really a great article. I would consider adding an info box on the left as it gives a quick summary about the article and adds a professional look to the article.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? One thing I want to change in my article would be adding more citation as you almost cited every sentence you wrote, which makes your article credible.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for this new article. Note that it is currently an "Orphan" meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See WP:DE-ORPHAN for pointers..

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)