Talk:Red Famine

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Piotrus in topic Tarik Amar review

Tarik Amar review edit

The Tarik Amar review was cited as evidence that “most” academic reviews of this book were negative. Academic Taras Kuzio wrote a negative review of that review, and it makes some convincing points.

Tarik Amar appears to be a contractor or employee of Russian state propaganda outfit RT. I have not yet read the entirety of either article, but Amar should probably be reviewed as a dubious source. —Michael Z. 04:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I concur. We should start by summarizing the reviews in mainstream (major) academic journals. Genocide Studies and Prevention, Europe-Asia Studies, New Eastern Europe all probably have more impact IMHO than Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal or Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. Europe-Asia Studies certainly is a major publication, based on indexing. Not that I am opposed to summarizing the reviews in KMHJ or Kritika. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply