 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to The End of Evangelion. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Canon edit
We really need a source for this claim that Anno approved the RCB as canon.
- It's Gainax copyrighted, so it's Anno-approved. Anno never complained about the RCP, and in the PS2 game "Evangelions/Evangelion 2" which Anno himself supervized, he confirms what the RCB said for example about Rei.
- So it's the claim that "Anno didn't approve the RCB" that would need to be documented. Folken de Fanel 11:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Gainax-copyrighted != Anno-approved. Just because Terminator 3 is copyrighted doesn't mean that James Cameron approved it. Gene Roddenberry never approved "Star Trek: The Animated Series". Don Bluth never approved any of the endless crappy sequels to "The Land Before Time". I could go on and on. Also, if you want to claim that Anno supervised or confirmed anything, you need to cite a source for that, too. Quoth the Wiki: "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." 71.198.156.164 09:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Gainax-copyrighted means Gainax made it. Where does Anno work ?
- Anno approved the RCB content in various other instances, like in the PS2 game...Folken de Fanel 12:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, another thing... where's the source for the claim that Gainax owns the copyright? Last I heard, it was written by the same company that published the manga and wrote its error-laden "dossiers". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.111.36 (talk) 04:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gainax-copyrighted != Anno-approved. Just because Terminator 3 is copyrighted doesn't mean that James Cameron approved it. Gene Roddenberry never approved "Star Trek: The Animated Series". Don Bluth never approved any of the endless crappy sequels to "The Land Before Time". I could go on and on. Also, if you want to claim that Anno supervised or confirmed anything, you need to cite a source for that, too. Quoth the Wiki: "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." 71.198.156.164 09:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Merge? edit
I see that there's already an entry in the media article about the book, but IMO this article doesn't have enough merit to stand on its own, given the small amount of material. I say put the information that's here in the media article. Agree/disagree? Willbyr (talk | contribs) 17:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Per [results of the AFD], I will do the merge at some point this week. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 17:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)