Talk:Red-crested tree-rat
 | A fact from Red-crested tree-rat appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article contains a translation of Santamartamys rufodorsalis from fr.wikipedia. |
Is this English? edit
"Despite several organised searches, no other specimens were discovered for." As a non-native speaker, I'm not totally sure about this, but I'd rather say it should be "no other specimens were discovered". Steinbach (talk) 12:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
External Measurements edit
Hi, the external measurements herein reported are referred to all specimens of the genus Diplomys, where this species was previously included. Actually only the measurements of the Holotype are known and these data can be seen on the original description published by J.A.Allen in 1899. For more informations you can visit the relative page on [1]. Best Regards.--A proietti (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
It should say sex and not gender edit
In the discovery it states that the individuals were of undetermined gender, since they're animals this should be sex. 2406:2D40:20BE:B110:342B:55B9:C6EF:CBB (talk) 01:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)