Talk:Red-Haired Shanks
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Tintor2 in topic Removed directed
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • List of One Piece characters Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:List of One Piece characters |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 May 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Removed directed edit
I have removed the redirect of the talk page to Talk:List of One Piece characters. Note that there's active discussion at Talk:List of One Piece characters § NPOV & Notability: Several Characters Need their Own Pages. --MarioGom (talk) 08:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Tintor2: Please, use articles for deletion if you think the article should be deleted or redirected. Best, MarioGom (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- MarioGom I'm not a fan of that guideline since it doesn't encourage the remake of article. I just merged it cos these articles were already made rushed and tagged for lacking any information to stand on its own. I already tried discussing this but all the users kept ignoring every guideline and reverted my edits, resulting in a edit war.Tintor2 (talk) 14:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Tintor2: If you blank redirect repeatedly and get reverted, you must seek consensus for your actions. The easiest way to build such consensus is articles for deletion. Repeatedly blanking the article is disruptive. Also, there is nothing preventing users from trying to improve the article in any way while it's being discussed at AfD. Reverting other users edits just because its notability is being discussed is not acceptable (see this diff: [1]). I would advise you to just wait for the outcome of the deletion discussion and stop disrupting other users' attempts to improve the article. MarioGom (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- MarioGom I'm not a fan of that guideline since it doesn't encourage the remake of article. I just merged it cos these articles were already made rushed and tagged for lacking any information to stand on its own. I already tried discussing this but all the users kept ignoring every guideline and reverted my edits, resulting in a edit war.Tintor2 (talk) 14:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- I won't make another revert but already the talk page from the characters list seems to be against this type of article. Maybe once the next movie is released there might be more content to create one or whenever Shanks returns to the narrative.Tintor2 (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Let’s be clear. User:Tintor2 was warned for being in an edit war for repeatedly redirecting this page. No other users were warned. The consensus among the editors of this page seem to be to keep the page as is and add more improvements. --Plumber (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- I was the only one you warned though and there was no clear consensus about how is that this article was notable because there were other users who removed content and there was a notificiation of this article suffering from copyrights violations shortly after it was created so this still needs to cleaned especially since another used still tagged it for the same notabilty problem you do not seem aware to understand in the character list. I'll shut up since I'm tired of explaining it.Tintor2 (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)