Talk:Recommerce

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recommerce companies

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed today that there have been several dozen edits to this section with external links and arguably notable company mentions. Do other articles dealing with a type of business/trade list out companies in each country with no rationale other than exist (ie. not necessarily notable)? It seems very promo-y and I think it may need to be re-written. I removed those that were recently added with external links. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

edit I realize lists don't require notability, I should've worded that better, I meant it's falling into the territory of WP:PROMO and link-farming. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hi Chrissy, i rewrote a lot of the article, but I am not a native speaker. If you want to polish the language go ahead. Fthobe (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Neologism?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've deleted the neologism tag; a google search shows about five million hits, which suggests the term is widely used (or, it may suggest the effectiveness of using Wikipedia to increase usage of a term). Anyway, it probably doesn't apply any more. Moonraker12 (talk) 02:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic