Talk:Recalled comics
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wasn't Scout 9 recalled because of the lousy paper quality? Trekphiler (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I guess this is the one by Eclipse SCOUT (1985-1987)? No sign of a recorded recalled issue by either CGC or ComicPriceGuide.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by U829683 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Could be it was just reissued. I recall having one of the flimsies, once. TREKphiler 22:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
More Info, Please
editThis article might benefit from more information about each comic -- at a minimum, the date of publication and perhaps the publisher of each. Also, is the "quantity" the number of issues that have survived, or the initial print run? HalJor (talk) 00:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Recalled comics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804230519/http://forum.newsarama.com:80/archive/index.php/t-5958.html to http://forum.newsarama.com/archive/index.php/t-5958.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The Sandman #18
editOne can see a preview of the Kindle version of The Sandman issue #18 on Amazon, and it shows the entire first page in full color. This leads me to believe that both the version printed with the blue panels and the one with yellow panels are erroneous. I can’t find a source that supports this, however. – Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 06:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)