Talk:Rebels of the Neon God

Fair use rationale for Image:Rebels of the neon god.jpg

Image:Rebels of the neon god.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Original research regarding revenge?

The entry refers to an act of "revenge" completing the circle. There is nothing explicitly stated in the film - at least not in the English subtitles - whether the act of vandalism toward the end of the film is an act of revenge or a plan to set up a meeting between the actor and victim of the vandalism (a meeting that does take place in the film). Therefore, the statement that the vandalism is revenge appears to be the opinion of the poster. Thisisnotatest (talk) 00:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)