Talk:Reasonable suspicion
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 73.225.182.47 in topic 4th Amendment Requirement of Probably Cause, Probably Suspicion is still only Suspicion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reasonable suspicion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1095 days ![]() |
![]() | A fact from Reasonable suspicion appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why a separate article?
editWhy is this a separate article from the Fourth Amendment article? Wouldn't it be better to fold this into the Fourth Amendment discussion, and make this a redirect to the Fourth Amendment?
- I don't think that's a good idea. There are lots of 4th Amendment subtopics with their own pages (probable cause, search and seizure, search warrant, arrest warrant, etc.) I think the topic deserves to be covered in more detail than what would be appropriate in the 4th Amendment article. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 19:35, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
4th Amendment Requirement of Probably Cause, Probably Suspicion is still only Suspicion
edit4th Amendment requirement is Probable Cause (Lawful reason)
Probably Suspicion is an erosion of the 4th Amendment, a lawful reason is necessary to comply with the 4th Amendment requirement.
Citing 9th Amendment (paraphrased) Laws shall not be construed to deny enumerated rights in the Constitution, or lessen other rights retained by the people.
. 73.225.182.47 (talk) 04:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Tae Hyun Song