This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Per WP:LEAD, "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents", "The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic", and "the emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources. Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." The edit made here, with the edit summary, "Restrucure, clean up, eliminate repetition", shows either a lack of awareness of, or simple indifference to, that guideline. As a summary of the article's most important contents, the lead obviously repeats, to some extent, other material in the article. To "eliminate repetition" in the way that edit did is to significantly degrade the quality of the article as a whole. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 19:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
