Talk:Really Love (KSI song)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures edit

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

General edit

  • production duo Mojam. - might need to explain what Mojam is. Weird to say "duo", and then say one thing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Anything linked and explained in the lede needs to also be linked and explained in the body, so links for KSI etc. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Being a UK garage track, KSI "thought it made sense" to ask British singer-songwriter Craig David to perform the chorus - is this quote necessary? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "We [sent the track] to Craig, hoping [that] he'd say yes. And he gave a resounding yes." - and this one. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • David recalled, "[KSI] reached out to me [and said], 'I've got this song that I think you'd be perfect on.' And I was like, 'Yeah, I'd be well up for it. Let me hear the song.' I heard it and I was like, 'Bro, this is a tune.' So I jumped on it that [same] night [and] vocalled it. I was going back and forth with [KSI], asking him, 'What [do you] think?' And he was so on it." - and this. Couldn't we just summarised by saying both men were on board with the draft? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The writing and production is almost exclusively quotes from both men being giddy about working on the project. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Really Love" is an uptempo UK garage and dance-pop track.[2][7][9][10] - WP:CITEKILL, do we need four cites to say this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • On 7 October 2020, KSI revealed via Twitter that he would soon be releasing a new single.[12] Two days later, KSI announced via social media - Twitter is social media though... Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The last three sections don't have any prose, could we have something explaining what it was about? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Review meta comments edit

It's been a while Timwikisidemen, any update on the above? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry Lee Vilenski, I just don't have the time right now to complete this review any time soon. It'll probably be in the next month. I don't mind if you fail the article for now.-- Timwikisidemen 07:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sure, sadly I'll have to fail this one, but the info above will remain. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 12:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply