Talk:Raymond Brownell/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Easily satisfies the Good Article requirements - well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Ian, I appreciate it. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)