 | Rather Die Young has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rather Die Young article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_(52946288505)_(slightly_cropped).jpg){kind=small}
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rather Die Young/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sauloviegas (talk · contribs) 00:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, I'll be reviewing this soon (probably tomorrow). - Saulo Talk to Me 00:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Infobox edit
Resolved comments
- "RMC Studio and Enormous Studios, (Los Angeles)" The track wasn't recorded there, was it? It wasn't according to Conception.
- Sorry about this. Fixed. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Great. - Saulo Talk to Me 14:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Lead edit
Resolved comments
- "criticizing its chorus which, according to them, forms the major part of the song." I'm a little lost here. Why would they criticize it if it forms the major part of the song? They criticized it because of what? The composition or the lyrics?
- Actually, if you look at the lyrics, you will find out that what she does for most of the part is repeating the chorus. Well, I did my best. Please let me know if you think we can phrase this better. I will be very happy. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- True... I don't see how it can be more clear than it is, then. - Saulo Talk to Me 14:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Conception edit
Resolved comments
- I think that this should be retitled. As with other articles from songs of 4, it should be either "Background and development" or "Background and production", because I don't see what this has to do with the conception: "Beginning on June 16 to June 27, 2011, the songs from 4 were available to listen to in full each day on Knowles' official website, paired with its accompanying photo spread from the album packaging and an insightful quote..." Be consistent, because each article has a different title regarding this same section.
- I re-titled it to Background and recording. Plus, fixed the other issue. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Great. - Saulo Talk to Me 14:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Composition and lyrical interpretation edit
Resolved comments
- Missing sources on the sample's description.
- Music samples rationales do not need to be sourced if what we write as a rationale is already there in the text ext to it. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. - Saulo Talk to Me 14:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
References edit
Resolved comments
Summary edit
- You did an outstanding job with this article. It is really mature and consistent overall. Congratulations. Fix these issues, then I'll take one more look and pass it. - Saulo Talk to Me 16:13, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Good job. Passing. - Saulo Talk to Me 14:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)