Talk:Rascal Flatts discography

Editing Dispute

I made the initial edits to this page this afternoon (January 14th) regarding the release of the new album coming out in September 2010. I included a source/reference. I later noticed that Caldorwards4 had deleted the album from the list, so I re-entered the edit (complete with source) with a note on Caldorwards4's talk page asking why (s)he had deleted the edit. Caldorwards4 proceeded to re-edit the page with a different format, and being a petty user, continued to edit the page in an attempt to "own" the page, showing by actions that the user was demanding that the page belonged to them, and that they must have their own way. I continued to revert back to the original edit, because it was the original, non vandalism edit.

Caldorwards4's edit constitute a type of vandalism.--Emgee1129 (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

I do not think I own this page and my edits are nowhere near vandalism. I am simply cleaning up the table to fix three things: 1. to be released is not the title so it does not need to be fully capitalized or italicized 2. we place colspan over the charts and certifications when an album is not yet released. (see Alan Jackson discography for example), 3. in the notes below the title it is to say To be released: September 2010 not Released: September 2010 because the album is not released. I am not the one who made up this idea as they've been used many times on many different articles. I am not removing things but just cleaning them up. Your accusations of me vandalising this article is stupid and idiotic and this needs to end. There are other users (such as User:EnDaLeCoMpLeX) that use this formatting. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Complete semantics. You clearly believe you own the page, because it is clearly the exact same content. You just believe that you have the absolute right to edit to your own specifications because you want YOUR edits there. It is clearly from what other users have said in your talk page that this is not an isolated incident with you. You have an obvious history of trying to own articles. --Emgee1129 (talk) 04:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rascal Flatts discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140829020626/http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/ask-billboard/268747/ask-billboard to http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/ask-billboard/268747/ask-billboard

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)