Talk:Rapture TV

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:Rapture.png

Comments edit

Where did that info about the magnetic tapes come from? --Timmywimmy 19:16, 25 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Responded on your talk page, as you posted to mine. Article needs a rewrite (I wrote most of it, so I can say that with impunity), which I'll do after I've mailed Wouter to see whats going on now.... That line is unlikely to stay, so you can remove it now if you want. --Kiand 20:22, 25 July 2005 (UTC)Reply


I was wondering if you are planning on updating this page any time soon? The channel has been relaunched and two of the anime series' featured are Wolf's Rain and Fullmetal Alchemist (just incase your didn't know). I would try, but I'm new at this and wasn't sure of your plans...

Its your TV channel (quite literally!), so edit away. If you could clean up the history section between "UBM starts it" and "it goes off air in 2004" whenever you have time it'd be excellent. I'll do something about the anime mention now though. --Kiand 20:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


Just to point out, I don't think the above is the same "Tartan" (as in David) who owns Rapture. The Tartan above is called Laura!

Definately not! I was wondering what the quite literally meant *was confused*. Tartan 20:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Oops. The MD of Rapture has used the nick Tartan online for quite some time, so I really assumed it was him. --Kiand 20:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Well, you learn something new everyday... Tartan 20:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have a feeling that Rapture TV didn't do very well because of its position. I hardly knew it was there because of the haphazard arrangement of channels within the surrounding region of 115 to 200. And when I did find it, I thought it was one of those religious channels. Wolf ODonnell 14:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
When it failed, spectacularly, it was on #458, although on the last collapse, its position was blamed. Its still not great, but the owners claimed (on their forum, can be found if anyone wants the reference) that viewing figures increased heavily when they moved from 288 to 193. --Kiand 14:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Rapture.png edit

 

Image:Rapture.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply