Talk:Raoof Haghighi
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Johnalexwood in topic Notability notice
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Notability
editThe references given in this article comply to WP's notability policies, so could someone please explain why a notability notice has appeared on this article? Johnalexwood (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- It may be due to problems in the sourcing. Looking at them, I see only one or two that provide any significant coverage at all. The rest are brief blurbs, trivial mentions, interview, citations to Wikipedia (which immediately suggests non-notability), redundant citations, or citations that don't have any coverage of the subject at all. I consolidated duplicate references and removed the citations to Wikipedia. What remains still needs improvement, particularly the orphan citations at the bottom. I question the notability of some of the rewards too; I think those can be trimmed, particularly the ones cited to blogs. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I agree definitely there is a sourcing issue (specifically for a BLP) but also there is an issue with too much information about this artists exhibition and award history and no information about their bio. Jooojay (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Notability notice
editThe article has many high quality references now, so when can the notability notice be removed? Johnalexwood (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)