Talk:Ranoidea chloris

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 167.179.174.55 in topic Is it poisonous

Litoria chloris does not extend from north of Sydney to Cape York, at least not any more. The distribution was not continuous, and the northern population was described as Litoria xanthomera by Davies, McDonald and Adams, in 1986. Common name is Orange-thighed Frog. Stevew139 06:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Someone should have picked up on that mistake before-its fixed now. Thanks for pointing it out.--Tnarg 12345 11:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Kills HIV? edit

This sounds pretty dramatic - is this then the cure for AIDS? Please add more detail - on its own it seems amazing but is not backed up. That is, I would expect citations and some information on how this information is being used. Robinson weijman (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've tagged it with a fact tag in which it needs. Bidgee (talk) 09:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm no expert, but in the reference section, it has a reference: Frog secretions block HIV infections which may be related. Also, you could have googled it and found a reference faster than posting here. PirateArgh!!1! 17:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Litoria chloris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Litoria chloris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Is it poisonous edit

?? 167.179.174.55 (talk) 08:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply