This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Randle Holme is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Linking to individuals, and having individual data at Wikidata is complicated by a shared page. I would recommend that this page be split into components, or at least sustainable components. — billinghurstsDrewth 06:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I can see your point. On the other hand, not all of the Randles have sufficient information to make separate articles, while this article is coherent. Given the length of time the tag has been in place, I am going to remove the tag. If you are certain that a split is needed then I am happy to set up an RfC. Op47 (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree with keeping the article as it is. One advantage of this is that it is often impossible to determine which RH was responsible for which work, making linking to separate articles impossible. A link to this combined article is often the only practical option. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
