Talk:Ramacharitam

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Proposed merge of Varendra rebellion into Ramacharitam edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, given no support for a proposal made more than a year ago; Varendra rebellion has significantly expanded, implying that the initial grounds for the proposal may no longer hold. Klbrain (talk) 10:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The sole source of the target-event is this article on a medieval poem, where I had already drafted all relevant information in a far detailed and contextual manner. For reasons (largely) unknown, Dear Debashis proposes to preserve the CFORK. (See this discussion.) TrangaBellam (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Support - Despite protracted engagement, they are unable to explain what extra information belongs at the source-article, that might not be accommodated over here. As things stand, we have a clear violation of WP:OVERLAP. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just FWIW, Dear Debashis' invocation of GNG is meaningless in the particular context of a merge. GNG comes into play only when some deletion of content (from the encyc.) is involved. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
To unscramble, the author of Varendra rebellion is Dear Debasish. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic