Talk:Ralph Roister Doister
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 210.1.193.14 in topic Erotics of the letter
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ralph Roister Doister article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article uses the following optional standards for Style elements.
Please help us maintain consistency in the article by following these standards:
Please do not change these settings unless consensus has been reached. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Erotics of the letter edit
While "Much like Terence's works, the play also "(displays) an erotics of the letter that simultaneously registers and occludes the 'open secret' of pederastic desire." may be true, it doesn't make much sense. Would someone like to elaborate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.193.14 (talk) 01:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)